Tag: international finance

  • Countdown to Pakistan’s budget unveiling: Last IMF review holds the key

    Countdown to Pakistan’s budget unveiling: Last IMF review holds the key

    Pakistan is heading towards a crucial phase as it prepares to unveil its budget on June 9, following an arduous bailout negotiation with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). A Fund official revealed that only one board review remains under the current IMF bailout package, which is seen as a step towards a successful review.

    Esther Perez Ruiz, the resident representative for Pakistan at the IMF, emphasised the need to restore the proper functioning of the foreign exchange market to pave the way for the final review.

    Ruiz outlined additional prerequisites, including passing a budget that aligns with the program objectives for the 2023-24 fiscal year, and securing credible financing commitments to address a $6 billion shortfall.

    Experts suggest that the coalition government is striving to strike a delicate balance between satisfying the demands of the IMF and winning over voters in the upcoming general election. Analysts expect the government to announce populist measures in the budget to appease the electorate while aiming to meet IMF prescriptions.

    The IMF program, which concludes this month, has approximately $2.5 billion in funds yet to be released due to ongoing negotiations between Pakistan and the lender. Pakistan’s economy is grappling with severe challenges, including high inflation, fiscal imbalances, and low reserves.

    The government is hoping that the general election scheduled for November will help alleviate the turmoil stemming from a protest campaign led by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman after his removal in a no-confidence vote last year.

    Former finance minister Miftah Ismail stressed the importance of securing IMF funding, highlighting the difficulties Pakistan would face without it. Ismail expressed confidence that the government would present a budget in line with IMF prescriptions to ensure the country’s survival in the next fiscal year.

    A staff-level agreement between Pakistan and the IMF to release $1.1 billion from a $6.5 billion package has been delayed since November, further intensifying the country’s need for funds to avert a balance of payments crisis. Experts believe that even after the current program expires, Pakistan will likely seek another bailout in the upcoming fiscal year to avoid defaulting on its debt obligations.

    Pakistan’s central bank reserves can cover imports for only about a month, underscoring the urgency of securing financial assistance. Inflation in the country, home to 220 million people, has reached a staggering 37.97 per cent in May, marking a record high for the second consecutive month and making it the highest rate in South Asia.

    The planning minister recently announced that development spending targets in the new fiscal year would be set at 1,150 billion rupees ($4.02 billion), while projecting an inflation rate of 21 per cent for the same period. With the general election looming, some analysts anticipate that the government will announce vote-winning measures, even if they have to be scaled back later.

    Pakistan’s budget unveiling tomorrow will be closely watched by the nation, as it not only sets the course for the fiscal year but also represents a crucial step in the ongoing negotiations with the IMF and the government’s efforts to regain stability and boost economic growth.

  • Pakistan is making desperate efforts to revive IMF programme before deadline

    Pakistan is making desperate efforts to revive IMF programme before deadline

    Pakistan is facing a critical situation as it seeks to revive its stalled Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The $6.5 billion programme is set to expire on June 30, and negotiations for the ninth review, due last November, have not been successful.

    Efforts to reach a Staff Level Agreement (SLA) with the IMF have been ongoing, but disagreements persist regarding the conditions set by the Fund. The SLA must be signed before Pakistan unveils its 2023-24 budget on June 9, or the current programme will fail.

    According to The News, two options are being considered. The first involves signing the SLA immediately, requesting approval from the IMF Executive Board for the next $1 billion tranche, and extending the EFF programme for a few months to complete the 10th and 11th reviews. The second option is to combine the 9th and 10th reviews, share budgetary figures with the IMF, and sign the SLA after the budget announcement. If approved by parliament, the IMF’s Executive Board could then grant an extension for the completion of the 11th Review by July or August 2023.

    However, finding a solution is proving challenging. Maintaining the status quo will not lead to any breakthroughs, and consensus must be reached between Pakistan and the IMF. Political uncertainty, inadequate economic management, and the inability to secure sufficient external financing have hindered progress.

    Without an IMF programme, Pakistan’s options are limited. The risk of default would increase, and reserves would remain weak. Although there are options available, such as striking the SLA in the next few days or combining reviews, they are becoming increasingly difficult. Life without the IMF would require seeking financing from other sources at higher costs.

    It is crucial for Pakistan to resolve its differences with the IMF and secure the continuation of the EFF programme. Failure to do so would have severe consequences for economic stability and future financing prospects.

  • Pakistan’s history of IMF bailouts: A look at 75 years of economic challenges

    Pakistan’s history of IMF bailouts: A look at 75 years of economic challenges

    Pakistan is currently facing yet another economic crisis, a recurring issue that has caused the country to repeatedly seek help from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for financial assistance.

    Unfortunately, most of the previous 13 bailouts granted since the late 1980s were left unfinished, as Pakistan failed to implement any meaningful structural changes to rein in government spending or boost revenue.

    The country’s current government, led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, is currently in talks to revive its latest $6.5 billion loan programme as a result of the ongoing economic downturn, exacerbated by last year’s devastating floods and continued political instability. However, the implementation of the necessary belt-tightening measures may prove to be challenging, given the upcoming national elections planned for later this year.

    Pakistan and the IMF had agreed to a $6 billion bailout program in 2019, but disputes over monetary policies have prevented the release of over $1 billion. Furthermore, donors and lenders have demanded structural reforms before providing any further financial aid to Pakistan.

    Pakistan’s traditional partners have made it clear that their assistance is conditional upon the revival of the IMF program and the successful implementation of reforms, including the expansion of tax collection.

    Based on the prevailing Special Drawing Rights (SDR), also known as XDR, rates, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has approved loans totaling $31.629 billion for Pakistan.

    It is worth noting, however, that not all of the approved funds have been disbursed, with only one out of 22 loans having been fully transferred to Pakistan. This highlights the complex political and economic dynamics that underlie IMF programs.

    Pakistan’s history of borrowing from the IMF

    Pakistan has a history of borrowing from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which can be divided into four distinct periods. The early years of borrowing spanned from 1950 to 1988, followed by the Benazir and Nawaz Sharif era from 1988 to 1999. The third period was marked by the Musharraf and Zardari administrations from 2000 to 2013. The current period is led by Nawaz Sharif and Imran Khan.

    During these periods, each government worked with the IMF differently, especially in the past two decades. While the Benazir and Nawaz Sharif administrations alternated in seeking IMF programs in the 1990s, the Musharraf government, despite experiencing substantial foreign currency inflows, also had to turn to Washington for financial assistance.

    The Zardari administration, on the other hand, abandoned the largest-ever IMF program when it deemed it expedient to do so. This trend illustrates how Pakistan’s borrowing from the IMF has been characterised by inconsistency and shifting priorities.

    2013-2022

    Pakistan’s recent history of borrowing from the IMF has been marked by different governments seeking assistance in their own unique ways. While the Imran Khan government initially refused to seek assistance from the IMF, it eventually sought an Extended Fund Facility (EFF) loan worth SDR4.268 billion in July 2019. This was due to the country’s financial deterioration and instability, which had eroded the stability gains made since late 2016.

    Under Imran Khan’s government, the IMF disbursed a total of SDR3,159.5 million to Pakistan in four tranches. However, talks for the fourth tranche proved challenging and the government sought help from the US Assistant Secretary of State Donald Lu. Despite receiving SDR750 million in February 2022, then-Prime Minister Imran Khan announced a subsidy on petrol and diesel, effectively breaking the agreement with the IMF. As a result, the IMF suspended Pakistan’s $6 billion loan programme in March 2022.

    Negotiations for the revival of the fund facility did not commence until May, when Shehbaz Sharif of the PML-N took over the government. Talks on reviving the fund facility were concluded in late June, but only after the government took some harsh decisions, including withdrawing tax relief for salaried individuals. The next tranche will only be released after the IMF Executive Board takes up the combined 7th and 8th reviews.

    2000-2013

    During Pervez Musharraf’s government, Pakistan received significant foreign aid in the form of military and civil assistance, resulting in a low reliance on IMF loans for financial support. However, Pakistan did receive two IMF loans in the first two years of Musharraf’s regime, totaling SDR520 million. The first loan was a stand-by arrangement of SDR465 million, of which SDR150 million were disbursed, and the second was an extended credit facility of SDR1.033 billion, of which only SDR315 million were disbursed. Pakistan did not require IMF assistance from 2001 to 2008, as foreign aid prevented a balance of payment crisis.

    However, the aid failed to boost Pakistan’s forex reserves, which experienced a sharp decline between 2006 and 2008. In 2008, the Pakistan Peoples Party government negotiated with the IMF for the largest-ever loan of SDR7.235 billion, also the largest stand-by arrangement. Only SDR5.2 billion were disbursed between 2008 and 2010 in three tranches. Afterward, the PPP government did not complete the program as it received funds under the Kerry-Lugar program until 2013, when the United States ceased funding. The PPP government was unable to implement tough reforms demanded by the IMF due to impending elections.

    1989-1999

    During the 1990s, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif sought eight bailouts from the IMF due to the consequences of the Soviet-Afghan war and political instability in Pakistan. In 1988, Bhutto signed up for two IMF packages, totaling SDR655 million. The IMF made two payments of SDR122.4 million and SDR189.5 million in 1991 and 1992. In 1993, Nawaz Sharif negotiated a loan of SDR265.4 million, with the IMF paying SDR88 million that year.

    Bhutto’s government signed three IMF programs of SDR379 million, SDR606 million, and SDR562 million between 1994 and 1995, with lower disbursements of SDR123 million, SDR133 million, and SDR107 million before being removed in 1996. Sharif then negotiated two loans in 1997 of SDR682.4 million and SDR454.9 million, respectively, with SDR250 million disbursed before his government was toppled in 1999. Bhutto negotiated a total of five programs of SDR2.2 billion, receiving SDR676.26 million, while Sharif signed up for three programs of SDR1.4 billion, with Pakistan receiving only SDR608 million. The instability of the government prevented the implementation of IMF reforms, which often led to increased tariffs and taxes, causing a negative perception of the IMF in the country.

    1958-1988

    The Zia-ul-Haq government received the largest amount of foreign aid from the International Monetary Fund in Pakistan’s history, surpassing the sum of all seven previous programs approved since 1958. In 1980, the IMF granted SDR1.268 billion to the government, followed by another program of SDR919 million in 1981. The Zia-ul-Haq administration received SDR1.079 billion out of the total SDR2.187 billion approved by the IMF.

    Before that, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto signed four loan programs with the IMF between 1972 and 1977 for a total of SDR330 million, of which SDR314 million was withdrawn. In 1958, Ayub Khan initiated Pakistan’s first loan from the IMF, seeking only SDR25 million, and in 1968 and 1969, two more programs of SDR37.5 million and SDR75 million were approved, respectively. The Ayub government received SDR112 million of the total SDR137.5 million approved.

    Pakistan has received a total of SDR23.656 billion in IMF-approved programs, of which SDR14.189 billion was disbursed. Pakistan was offered three long-term Extended Credit Facilities, five medium-term Extended Fund Facilities, at least 12 short-term Standby Arrangement loans, and one Structural Adjustment Facility over 63 years.

    This news story was created by compiling information from various news platforms as well as the IMF website.

  • Pakistan received over $48 billion in bailout loans from China between 2008-2021

    Pakistan received over $48 billion in bailout loans from China between 2008-2021

    A study published on Tuesday revealed that China has spent $240 billion rescuing 22 developing countries between 2008 and 2021. This amount has increased in recent years as more countries struggled to repay loans taken for the building of “Belt & Road” infrastructure.

    The researchers, from the World Bank, Harvard Kennedy School, AidData, and the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, found that almost 80 per cent of the rescue lending was made between 2016 and 2021, primarily to middle-income countries such as Pakistan, Argentina, and Mongolia. However, lending has decreased since 2016 as many projects failed to generate expected financial dividends.

    The report also highlighted that Beijing’s ultimate objective was to rescue its banks, which is why it engaged in the risky business of international bailout lending. Chinese loans to countries in debt distress increased from less than 5 per cent of its overseas lending portfolio in 2010 to 60 per cent in 2022.

    Argentina received the highest amount of bailout money with $111.8 billion, followed by Pakistan with $48.5 billion and Egypt with $15.6 billion, while nine countries received less than $1 billion.

    According to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) swap lines accounted for $170 billion of the rescue financing, including in Suriname, Sri Lanka, and Egypt. Bridge loans or balance of payments, supported by Chinese state-owned banks, amounted to $70 billion. Rollovers of both types of loans totaled $140 billion. However, the study criticized some central banks for potentially using the PBOC swap lines to artificially pump up their foreign exchange reserve figures.

    China is currently negotiating debt restructurings with several countries, including Zambia, Ghana, and Sri Lanka. However, it has been criticized for holding up the processes. In response, it has called on the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to offer debt relief as well.