Tag: journalism

  • VIDEO: Heated argument between PTI’s Shahbaz Gill and anchor Kamran Shahid

    VIDEO: Heated argument between PTI’s Shahbaz Gill and anchor Kamran Shahid

    Special Assistant to Prime Minister (SAPM), Dr Shahbaz Gill, alleged that anchorperson Kamran Shahid was asked to spread fake news and misquote facts about the United Kingdom’s (UK) court order to unfreeze Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) President Shehbaz Sharif and his family’s bank accounts for lack of evidence of corruption and money laundering. A heated exchange took place between the two on Dunya News‘ programme, ‘On the Front with Kamran Shahid’.

    Gill started off by reading a few statements by Kamran Shahid and gave details of the statements, which as per him were fake news and were factually incorrect.

    Gill’s comments led to a heated exchange of words between Gill and Kamran.

    “Sir, no one can make me misquote statements, not the prime minister or Azhar Javed [UK-based journalist working for Dunya News],” replied Kamran Shahid.

    “You cannot say that I misquote my facts. I have been in journalism for the past 15 years. I am not indulging in any personal attacks against you and neither should you. No one can make me say things that are factually incorrect, not PM Imran Khan, not Shehbaz Sharif, no one,” added Shahid.

    “You are wrong here, no one has the courage to make me misquote my statements or facts. Refrain from doing this.”

    “Let the masses decide about your statements, seems like you are running for an election,” said Gill in response to Shahid’s answer.

    “I have the right to judge the prime minister, he is my PM as well. I supported him long before your [Shahbaz Gill] career as a politician started in Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI),” said Shahid.

    “You have a fascist regime, your party is monitoring everything, you all do one-sided reporting on Pakistan Television Network (PTV), there is no mention of the Opposition in their reporting. If you so highly support journalism why haven’t you made media independent from the information ministry,” said Shahid.

    Shahid added, “PM promised in my show that he will raise the standard of PTV like that of the BBC, now should I say the PM lied?”

  • Rahimullah Yusufzai: A giant in the profession

    Rahimullah Yusufzai: A giant in the profession

    The death of Rahimullah Yusufzai is a terrible blow to journalism – not just in this region, but at a global level. He was one of the best-known and most well-respected journalists on the subject of the Afghan conflict and considered an authority on the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. With his passing we have lost not just an important source of context and information, we have lost a master practitioner of this craft, somebody who was dedicated to truth and accuracy, and who was always ready to go into the field, talk to people, find the story, understand the context.

    Despite his considerable fame, Rahimullah sahab, as we always called him, remained modest about his achievements and very down to earth about everything.  What I most remember about him was his enthusiasm for his work and the professionalism with which he did it. In the three decades, I knew him, he never turned down a request for an interview or a story – even if this was a very short notice.

    In this picture, late Rahimullah sahab, Resident Editor of The News is seen working in his office

    Rahimullah sahab was recommended to Newsline in 1989 by another journalist (I think it was Aziz Siddiqui, then editor of the Frontier Post). At that time, he worked for the Frontier Post in Peshawar and Rahimullah sahab would file the monthly political roundup from the province for us. His copy was impeccable and his political insights sound but what was also very interesting was his readiness to write on other subjects. We would ask about possible writers or reporters for sports and culture stories and he would offer to do everything himself. I remember a few responses like: “Sports – that’s my first love! I can do that for you,” and “Culture, I can cover that for you.” And he really could. He was extremely versatile; a story he did on Pashto cinema was one of Newsline’s greatest hits.

    Newsline, founded by Razia Bhatti, was an independent, journalist-owned venture and we often struggled with finances but Rahimullah sahab was a great supporter in those early years and he remained so throughout his life. In March this year – just six months ago – he was a guest speaker at the IBA Centre for Excellence in Journalism’s  Razia Bhatti Memorial lecture. It was indeed a privilege to have him deliver the lecture in which he spoke specifically about his 1998 interview with Osama bin Laden (OBL) and more generally about reporting on the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

    Earlier press briefing with OBL 1998

    The event was titled ‘Tea with Osama bin Laden’, and despite being a virtual event, it was extremely well attended. After Kamal Siddiqui of CEJ, Akbar Zaidi of IBA and I had said a few introductory words, Rahimullah sahab began his talk by saying how “humbled and honoured” he was by what had been said. We had only stated facts and talked about his achievements and reputation. I had also spoken about his great sense of professional solidarity, but the fact that he was so touched by what we said showed how modest he remained about his achievements.

    The talk itself was extremely interesting and full of detail. His account of a 1998 presser with OBL was fascinating. He recalled that he asked OBL a number of awkward questions, one of which was how wealthy was he. In response, OBL had put his hand on his heart and said he was rich (‘ghani’)  in there and thus deflected the enquiry. There was a lot of interesting detail in his account of the OBL interview, which took place a few months after the press briefing — how it was arranged, what constraints there were, how he was asked to destroy a photo he took of OBL entering the tent because Osama bin Laden was walking with the aid of a stick and the organisation “didn’t want him to look weak”.

    In the Q&A session after the talk, Rahimullah sahab also spoke about a number of other experiences and issues. When asked about any advice he wanted to remind journalism students of, he said the most important issues were just “hard work and honesty”. He emphasised the need for proper preparation and research (tayari). He also said laughingly that he was perhaps the person who had taken the most photographs of OBL but that in the early years, he had sold them to various outlets, not for very much money. That sounds right, Rahimullah sahab was very much a person who wanted to get on with his work rather than promote his own persona or negotiate lucrative deals for his work.

    We also talked about the Sharbat Gula matter. Sharbat Gula was the green-eyed Afghan girl whose photograph had appeared on the cover of National Geographic in 1984, and who was featured again by the publication more than a decade later (and who Pakistan, rather pointlessly, deported in 2016 despite her having lived in the country for decades). Rahimullah sahab was the person who traced her for National Geographic after all those years and he spoke about that and how he was able to negotiate with the publication on her behalf. He needn’t have done that — many journalists would have looked only to their own interests but Rahimullah sahab made sure to help Sharbat Gula’s family to get something from the magazine (medical aid, Hajj expenses, and a small monthly stipend). He said he had never mentioned all of this publicly before but now he was putting it into his book. When asked when we might see this book completed, he lamented he wasn’t able to give enough time to this because the misfortune of a working journalist like himself was he was always so involved with various deadlines on a daily basis. He also mentioned the financial pressures journalists in Pakistan were facing and how his employers had not paid their staff for months.

    He recalled that a CNN producer who had once interviewed OBL had managed to produce two books based just on that one meeting and how so many others who had met Osama had managed to get so much mileage out of the experience. He said somehow the fascination with the man and the movement continued, yet he himself had not really taken advantage of this, but that he would record such experiences in his book.

    But now Rahimullah sahab is gone. We don’t know if any part of his book is complete or whether it was in notes and planning form. But he does leave behind a vast body of work in journalism. He is now invariably described as a ‘veteran’ journalist, which is apt: he covered the Afghan conflict for years and interviewed nearly every Afghan leader of consequence, including Dr Najeebullah and several leading mujahideen. He had a rare insight and understanding of the politics of his own country and province. He leaves behind a tremendous void – not just was he an experienced reporter and an informed analyst, he was an invaluable source of information and one of the people still practising the craft of journalism with integrity and commitment.

    Apart from his enthusiasm for his work, his meticulous attention to detail and fact-checking, and his ability to present a balanced and factual picture, what I shall remember also about Rahimullah sahab is the tremendous grace and dignity with which he always conducted himself – whether on reporting assignments, in international conferences or in small villages. He was never one to curry favour or be impressed by pomp or power. He always remained essentially a journalist: looking for stories, talking to people, ascertaining the facts, and abiding by the basic principles of journalism.

    Rahimullah sahab towered above most of his colleagues physically in his life but professionally too, he was a giant of the profession. We shall all miss him very much.

  • PTI reacts to report on false claims of ministers and govt officials

    PTI reacts to report on false claims of ministers and govt officials

    Journalist Benazir Shah’s exclusive report featured on Geo News highlighted the misleading claims of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) numerous ministers and government officials.

    Since the PTI came to power in 2018, its lawmakers and officials have made the most of ‘fake news’ and used it to discredit journalists, media organisations, and the party’s opponents.

    “The offending language is often used to distort the truth and to undermine journalism, which aims to keep the powerful in check. When in reality those handing out the label of ‘fake news’ have occasionally stumbled themselves, especially when communicating with the public. A large number of ministers and government officials from the ruling party have fallen for false and misleading claims. In some instances, clarifications are issued, but in others, no corrections have been made to date,” read the report.

    September 2021: Minister of State Ali Muhammad Khan claims that Quaid-e-Azam went to jail

    Claim: Minister of State, Ali Muhammad Khan while speaking on 92 News programme, ‘Hard Talk Pakistan with Moeed Pirzada’ said, “We made the country. In 1947, my grandfather, Muhammad Wakeel Khan, went jail with Quaid-e-Azam.”

    Truth: There is no claim to the fact that the founder of Pakistan was ever arrested.

    August 2021: The ministry of information released a report, which incorrectly flag pro-state tweets as ‘anti-state’

    Claim: A report was released by the Digital Media Wing (DMW) of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting titled, ‘Anti-State Trends: Deep Analytics Report’. It was deeply misleading and based on assumptions instead of facts.

    “The purpose of this report was to ascertain factual data and to analyse social media trends that were anti-state, Data was collected after analysing Pakistan Twitter Panel from June 2019- August 2021. Those hashtags were marked for data collection where the content of tweets was planned and propagated through a network to spread anti-state trends,” General Manager of the Digital Media Wing (DMW), Imran Ghazali told The Current.

    Truth: The report seemed to declare all the users in the report as anti-state until one prominent journalist reached out to the government and they eventually added the disclaimer after the report was published.

    June 2020: Minister of State Zartaj Gul claimed that ‘Covid-19’ actually has 19-points, hence the name

    Claim: Minister of State for Climate Change, Zartaj Gul, while speaking on PTV said that Covid-19 actually has 19 points, which can be applied to any country to combat coronavirus.

    Truth: Covid-19 is actually a short form for Coronavirus disease.

    June 2020: Prime Minister Imran Khan misquotes Allama Iqbal 

    Claim: In a tweet, Prime Minister (PM) Imran Khan shared an image, which had poetry written on it along with Allama Iqbal’s picture, and wrote, “This poem by Iqbal reflects how I try to lead my life. I urge our youth to understand and absorb the poem of the great Iqbal and I guarantee them that it will release their great God-given potential that we all possess as His greatest creation Ashraf ul Mukhluqat.”

    Truth: PM Khan later tweeted, “I stand corrected – this is not Allama Iqbal’s poem but the message conveyed is what I have stood by and tried to follow.”

    May 2020: Minister Murad Saeed insists the governor of New York wants to follow Pakistan’s model of contact tracing

    Claim: Minister for Communication Murad Saeed, while addressing the National Assembly, said that the governor of New York wanted to follow Pakistan’s model of contact tracing after PM Khan gave the concept of smart lockdown.

    Truth: As per the report published on Geo, not a single briefing of the governor was found stating the claim made by the minister.

    September 2019: Minister of Human Rights Shireen Mazari shares incorrect video

    Claim: Minister of Human Rights Shireen Mazari shared an incorrect video on Twitter and wrote, “Indian occupation forces can’t even bare to see fruit trees live in IOJK – lest the Muslim Kashmiris eat the fruit. Such is the barbarism of the Rogue Modi Govt’s fascist hate-filled mindset. #Kashmir”

    Truth: The video shared was from Himachal Pradesh, 2018 when India, after a court order against illegal forest encroachment, ordered the trees to be chopped.

    May 2019: Minister Fawad Chaudhry claims that the Hubble telescope was sent into space by Suparco

    Claim: Fawad Chaudhry while speaking on Geo News programme, Naya Pakistan said that the Hubble telescope was sent into space by Suparco, the national space agency of Pakistan.

    Truth: Hubble was deployed by NASA.

    However, the ruling party reacted to the report.

  • ‘Utterly Disgusting’, Twitter reacts to Anchor Imran Khan’s video justifying Noor Mukadam’s murder

    A video clip of television Anchor Imran Khan is making rounds on social media, in which Imran can be heard drawing parallels between Noor Mukadam’s murder and her lack of telephonic conversation with her father.

    Twitter reacted to the video of Imran Khan victim blaming calling it ‘utterly disgusting’. Have a look at the reactions:

    https://twitter.com/Hebah6291/status/1424959168671272986

    https://twitter.com/spillthechai4/status/1424794056492830723
    https://twitter.com/abdullahsultan/status/1424984419564204042

    Imran reacted to the criticism against him by unapologetically posting a screenshot of Human Rights Minister Shireen Mazari’s conversation in a private group, which is a breach of her privacy.

  • Journalists Amir Mir and Imran Shafqat ‘arrested’ by FIA

    Journalists Amir Mir and Imran Shafqat ‘arrested’ by FIA

    Senior journalists Amir Mir and Imran Shafqat went missing on Saturday morning from Lahore.

    Hamid took to Twitter and confirmed the news. “Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) Cyber Crimes Wing Lahore kidnapped journalist Amir Mir in Lahore this morning.”

    “We came to know about his location after 5 hours. FIA snatched his [Amir Mir’s] phone and laptop,” read the tweet. Amir Mir is Hamid Mir’s brother.

    Hamid Mir also wrote about the disappearance of Imran Shafqat, stating that FIA arrested him as well.

    Meanwhile, Imran Shafqat was arrested from his house by use of force. As per reports, around10 people, both men, and women barged into his residence, raided his place, and took him away.

    Talking to BBC, Imran Shafqat’s sister Anum Noor said, “The bell rang at our house in Mughalpura area of Lahore at 12:30pm today. My brother Imran Shafqat opened the door after which 10 people entered our house.”

    Anum Noor said eight of the 10 people were without uniforms and two were wearing “white uniforms”.

    “They said we came from the FIA. Didn’t say more than that. Neither did they show an arrest warrant,” added Noor.

    “They dragged my brother out of the house,” said Noor Anum.

    Journalist Shahid Aslam confirmed that both Amir Mir and Imran Shafqat are in the custody of FIA.

    Director FIA Cyber Crimes Wing Lahore, DIG Babar Bakht is supervising the investigation, as per Shahid Aslam.

    Reportedly Imran Shafqat is accused of doing a Vlog against the “First Lady” whereas the reasons to arrest Amir Mir are still unknown.

    Some say Amir Mir has been arrested for a news story that ran on his YouTube channel, Googly News.

    Twitter reacted to the alleged abduction of both Imran Shafqat and Amir Mir.

    Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) tweeted, “We demand safe return and an immediate inquiry into the circumstances of his disappearance.”

     Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto strongly condemned the arrest of journalists Amir Mir and Imran Shafqat and demanded their release.

    Journalist Raza Rumi tweeted, “I have spent about 18 summers of my life in England. I have seen the British media, they are very open and free. But the Pakistan media, in my opinion, is freer than the British media: PM Imran Khan.”

    Journalist Asma Shirazi questions, “When will the disappearance of journalists stop?”

    Journalist Zebunnia Burki tweeted, ” I’d say unbelievable, but it’s really not.”

  • ‘PM Khan not a press freedom predator’, says govt

    ‘PM Khan not a press freedom predator’, says govt

    Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government has strongly rejected the Paris-based media watchdog’s report, which lists Prime Minister Imran Khan among the world’s 37 worst rulers when it comes to press freedom.

    The angry reaction from Khan’s government came in response to a report by Reporters Without Borders titled, “Press freedom predators gallery — old tyrants, two women, and a European,” reports Associated Press (AP).

    Pakistan’s Information Ministry in a statement on Tuesday rejected the allegations, saying Khan’s government believed in “freedom of expression and media independence”.

    In a statement, the ministry said it was surprising that Reporters Without Borders “has jumped to the conclusion” that media in Pakistan are under draconian censorship measures by Khan’s government. It said the government has been “taking all possible measures to create a congenial environment for journalists to perform their professional obligations”.

    “It appears that the report that (Reporters Without Borders) has issued is an attempt to malign the elected representative of the people of Pakistan, without any corroborative evidence,” the ministry said.

    The ministry said it hoped that the watchdog in the “future will avoid such irresponsible journalism”.

    Reporters Without Borders has published a gallery of grim portraits on its official website. It includes 37 heads of state or government who crack down massively on press freedom. Some of these “predators of press freedom” have been operating for more than two decades while others have just joined the blacklist, which for the first time includes two women and a European predator.

  • Reporters Without Borders calls PM Khan a predator, Marriyum Aurangzeb agrees

    Reporters Without Borders calls PM Khan a predator, Marriyum Aurangzeb agrees

    Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) information secretary Marriyum Aurangzeb has claimed that the latest report of the Reporters Without Borders also known as Reporters Sans Frontiers (RSF), is a charge-sheet against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government, reports Dawn.

    Reporters Without Borders categorically calls Prime Minister Imran Khan a ‘predator since taking oath’. The report has been published under the caption “RSF’s 2021: Press freedom predators gallery – old tyrants, two women and a European.”

    In a statement on Monday, Marriyum Aurangzeb said Imran Khan’s alleged “authoritarian attitude” and character was destroying Pakistan’s image abroad.

    “The report says that the PTI government is worse than military dictatorships in Pakistan when it comes to press freedom. The Human Rights Watch, Pakistan Press Freedom Report, and Freedom Network Report had already declared the Imran government as the worst media gagging administration in the history of the country,” said Aurangzeb.

    Aurangzeb said the latest report of the Reporters Without Borders had exposed the “predatory behaviour” of the government. She said the actions by the PTI government had not only reflected negatively on Pakistan’s journalism but also adversely affected the country’s position when it came to Financial Action Task Force and the GSP Plus status by the European Union.

    “It mentions that journalists are harassed, abducted, and assaulted for crossing the red lines defined by the state. The report also pointed out that freedom of expression on social media is also being curbed through new dark and draconian laws,” she said while quoting from the report.

    Meanwhile, Focal Person to the Prime Minister on Digital Media Dr Arslan Khalid took to Twitter and called the RSF report a “typical propaganda”.

    Arslan further added that it was comical that the RSF was talking about free speech and yet calling people trolls who “dare to disagree with journalists”.

    Reporters Without Borders has published a gallery of grim portraits on its official website. It includes 37 heads of state or government who crack down massively on press freedom. Some of these “predators of press freedom” have been operating for more than two decades while others have just joined the blacklist, which for the first time includes two women and a European predator.

    19 of these predators rule countries that are coloured red on the RSF’s press freedom map, meaning their situation is classified as “bad” for journalism, and 16 rule countries coloured black, meaning the situation is “very bad.” The average age of the predators is 66. More than a third (13) of these tyrants come from the Asia-Pacific region, says the report.

    Besides Prime Minister Imran Khan, the RSF list includes Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Chinese President Xi Jingping, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Tajik President Emamoli Rakhmon, Sri Lanka’s President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, King of Bahrain Hamed bin Isa Al Khalifa and Supreme Leader of North Korea Kim Jong-un.

  • Rape apology is not ‘common sense’

    Rape apology is not ‘common sense’

    A video of a TV talk show host recently went viral in which he was comparing women with ‘toffees. He said that if you left an unwrapped candy on the road for an hour, nobody would eat it because it would have been attacked by viruses, bacteria, germs, flies, mosquitoes, etc. He made this comparison in response to the backlash that Prime Minister Imran Khan is facing after his recent interview where he blamed women for sexual violence. When journalist Jonathan Swan asked PM Khan about sexual violence in Pakistan and if he thought that what women wear has any effect and if that’s part of this temptation, PM replied: “If a woman is wearing very few clothes it will have an impact on the man unless they are robots. It’s common sense.”

    It is not common sense to blame the victim for a sexual crime; it is not common sense to blame women for being raped instead of blaming the real culprit, i.e. the rapist; it is not common sense to tell women what to wear; it is not common sense that the prime minister of a country would issue a rape apology instead of responding to the question by simply saying that no, women’s clothes have nothing to do with rapes or sexual crimes. Period. When the prime minister tries to equate women’s clothes, it is not just irresponsible but also has far-reaching consequences. When people question victims of sexual assault about what they were wearing, it is an affront to all the survivors, dead and alive. It was also quite sad to see three women MNAs defending PM’s rape apology. We understand that it is their job to defend their party and leadership but it would have been better if they had just remained quiet if they could not condemn this statement.

    PM Khan’s comments are not just triggering for all victims and survivors of sexual abuse but are downright insulting. What was a six-month old baby wearing when they were raped, what was little Zainab wearing when she was raped, what was the boy in the madrassa wearing that ‘tempted’ Mufti Aziz, what were dead women wearing in their graves when someone dug out their bodies to rape them? Rape is not about lust. It is about power, humiliation, control. Rape is a violent crime, which has nothing to do with the way anyone dresses. In the United States, a Federal Commission on Crime of Violence study found that most convicted rapists could not remember what their victims were wearing. This is just a myth perpetuated by many, including the TV talk show host who thinks women are somehow candies or PM Khan who thinks women’s clothes somehow tempt men unless those men are ‘robots’ who do not act after being ‘tempted’.

    Rape apology in any form is unacceptable. We hope that the PM will realise his mistake and not repeat it because such comments do not make women feel safe, at all. 

  • EXCLUSIVE: ‘I did the speech knowing I would lose my job,’ Hamid Mir

    EXCLUSIVE: ‘I did the speech knowing I would lose my job,’ Hamid Mir

    Hamid Mir doesn’t sound like he’s down. On the contrary, the seasoned journalist sounds energised and alive. His phone was dead (or switched off) for the past two days, when The Current tried to reach out to him. Eventually when we got through, he didn’t pause for a second and gave us his version of the event that led to his removal from his flagship show, ‘Capital Talk’ on Geo News.

    “What will Geo probe?” he said when asked that Geo News had stated that they would “check for violation of policy and law” in a speech given by Hamid Mir “that resulted in backlash from different segments of society”.

    “My speech did not air on Geo News, it was not published in the newspaper,” Mir said categorically, “so how is Geo responsible when it never appeared on their television screens?”

    But Mir does admit that the pressure is intense on the management of his channel, which ultimately falls on him. “I am always prepared for pressure,” he says calmly, “I offered to leave the channel on Friday night when I was asked to clarify my statement. I told the management that when I never spoke on your channel, why do I need to issue a clarification? I was then told not to tweet on the issue and also that I should not take part in any other programmes,” Mir explained. “I was going to go on different news channels and said that I am not going to discuss my speech but to discuss the media ordinance. I was asked not to do so and therefore, I didn’t. I did tell them [management] that ‘they’ will ask you to remove me from the programme in a day or so and that’s exactly what happened.”

    When asked what it was about this particular case that drove Mir to give the speech, he said it was because of a man in a wheelchair.

    “When I was about to speak, if you notice in the video, there is a man on my right side sitting on a wheelchair. The man is an old journalist Qaiser Butt and he randomly said, ‘Larki ka bhai ho sakta hai‘ (it can be the girl’s brother) implying that Toor was part of an illicit relationship. That made me angry since Asad was standing right there as well. I got de-tracked and said, ‘larki ki maa bhi ho sakti hai jo General Rani hai‘. But it’s not just that.”

    Mir says the biggest reason for speaking out had been building up for the past three weeks. “In the past two, three weeks, some female colleagues were complaining that they were being threatened and one told me that ‘they’ came to her house. They didn’t cause her any harm but gave her a message.” He added that two female journalists also wanted to file a case but they have restrictions that are different. “Their husbands tell them not to report the cases; they face problems with their in-laws.”

    Mir is hopeful for change this time. “I did the speech knowing I would lose my job and I was prepared for that,” he says. “Right now, as I am speaking with you, I am at a meeting with the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP). Hina Jilani is also here and the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) is going to be releasing a white paper on the new cases that have come up. I can’t tell you, I have been swamped with calls of people that are now finally coming forward with cases and want to raise their voice.”

    “Lots of people are taken off air, but there has never been such a big reaction,” Mir says, explaining that in this particular case, the local and international reaction is bigger than he expected. “I am getting a lot of calls from international networks wanting to cover the story and because of this interest, I believe that some pressure will be put on the political government for accountability.”

    “Lots of ministers are messaging me in private, lending their support,” Mir said. “Perhaps this time, we might see some actual change.”

    Hamid Mir was taken off air on Monday.

  • گولی لگے تاکہ باہر جائیں

    گولی لگے تاکہ باہر جائیں

    باہر جانے کا کس  کو شوق نہیں ،  گھر  سے باہر نہیں ملک سے باہر جانے کا ۔ ہم میں سے بیشتر لوگ باہر سیر و تفریح کرنے جاتے ہیں تا کہ زندگی کے تھکا دینے والے سلسلے سے کچھ دیر تو چھٹکارا ملے ۔ کچھ لوگ باہر جا کے صرف لوگوں کو بتانا چاہتے ہیں کہ وہ برج خلیفہ کی سوئی کو ہاتھ لگا کر آئے ہیں  اور مونا لیزا کی تصویر میں کوئی خاص بات نہیں  ، اس سے بہتر تصویر ہم خود بنا لیں ۔ اور کچھ لوگوں کی ویسے ہی بس ہو گئی ہے ملک میں تو وہ اپنی زندگی کا سب کچھ بیچ کر  ملک ہمیشہ کے لیے چھوڑ جاتے ہیں ، یہ سوچتے ہوئے کہ اس  ملک میں ملی ہوئی عزت سے بہتر باہر کی بے عزتی ہے  ، افسوس تو نہیں ہوتا نہ کہ اپنے بے عزتی کر رہے ہیں !

    دوسرے ملکوں میں بات یہیں ختم ہوجاتی ہے کہ باہر گئے اور واپس آ گئے ۔ لیکن پاکستان میں باہر جانے کو ایک خاص ہی مقام حاصل ہے ۔ ملک سے باہر جانے کو سیاسی نظر سے دیکھیں تو شاعر حضرات جو اپنی انقلابی شاعری کے لیے مشہور تھے ، انہیں بھی ملک چھوڑنا پڑا ۔ ایک ان سے ملک چھڑوایا اور پھر ان کو غدار کا سرٹیفکیٹ بھی دے دیا ۔اور جب وہ واپس نہیں آئے تو سب نے کہا ” تھا ہی غدار ، باہر صحیح عیاشی کرتا رہا ہے، اس کے تو مزے ہوگئے” جن سیاست دانوں سے سب کی نہ بنی ان کو بھی ڈیل میں باہر کا ملک دے دیا  کہ چلیں آپ اب تھوڑا آرام  کر لیں، ملک کا بیڑا غرق اب ہم کریں گے۔ ہمیں بھی تو موقع دیں نا۔  سیاسی طور پر اس دن حد ہی ہو گئی جب پاکستان کے ایک وزیرِ اعظم کو کہا گیا کہ لوگ تنگ آ کر ملک چھوڑ رہے ہیں ، تو انہوں نے جواب میں کہا ” ہاں تو چلے جائیں ، ان کو روک بھی کون رہا ہے ” خود بتائیں اس سے زیادہ خیال رکھنے واالی حکومت آپ کو کہیں اور مل سکتی ہے ؟  نہ آپ کو کوئی روک رہا ہے، نہ کوئی ٹوک رہا ہے، جہاں مرضی جائیں۔

    لیکن یہ باہر جانا کچھ عجیب شکل اختیار کر چکا ہے ۔ اب لوگ کہتے ہیں

     “اس نے اپنے آپ کو خود مار پڑوائی  تاکہ وہ ملک سے باہر جا سکے ” یہ الزام جن لوگوں پر لگ رہا ہے ان میں صحافی ، انسانی حقوق کے علمبردار،اور ظلم کے خلاف آواز اٹھانے والا ہر شخص شامل ہے ۔ وہ ظلم کے خلاف آواز اٹھاتے ہیں ، ظالم ان کی آواز بند کرتے ہیں۔ کبھی ان کو ذہنی اذیت  دے کر تو کبھی جسمانی ۔ کچھ سہہ جاتے ہیں اور کچھ کو واقعی ملک چھوڑنا پڑ جاتا ہے۔  جو ملک چھوڑ جاتے ہیں ، ان کے بارے میں کہا جاتا ہے “خود مار پڑوائی تھی اپنے آپ کو تاکہ گوروں سے ہمدردی حاصل کر کے ملک چھوڑ سکیں” ۔

     15 سال کی ملالہ کو  جب گولی لگی  اور انہیں باہر لے جایا گیا  تو پاکستان میں سوال  ہی کچھ اور تھے ۔ “ملالہ کو جہاں  گولی لگی وہاں سوراخ کیو ں نہیں ہے؟  سر میں گولی لگنے سے کون بچ سکتا ہے ؟ کہیں خود گولی  تو نہیں لگوائی؟ اور آخر میں پھر وہی بات کہی گئی “باہر جانے کا بہانہ تھا ، گولی لگی ہی نہیں”

    اب کوئی سچ بولنے والا صحافی ہو یا ظلم کے خلاف آواز اٹھانے والا انسان ، اس کو کوئی گھر میں گھس کر مارے ، یا گھر کے باہر سے اٹھا کر غائب کر دے ، اس کا اخبار بند کروا دے ، اس کے گھر والوں کو کوئی دھمکیاں دے جائے ، ہر چیز پر ہماری محب ِوطن قوم کا ایک ہی نعرہ ہوتا ہے “خود کروایا ہے تاکہ ملک سے باہر جا سکے ” ۔ بات صرف یہاں نہیں رکتی، کوئی صحافی زخمی ہو تو محبِ وطن لوگ پوچھتے ہیں  “یہ زیادہ زخمی کیوں نہیں ہے؟ ایسے کون زخمی ہوتا ہے ؟ خود کروایا ہوگا”  کسی کا خون زیادہ نہ نظر آئے تو تب بھی یہی کہا جاتا ہے “یہ کیسا تشدد ہے جس میں خون کا دریا نہیں بہا؟ لگتا  ہے خود کروایا ہے تاکہ ملک سے باہر جا سکے ” کسی صحافی کو کچھ گھنٹوں کے لیے غائب کرنے کے بعد جب واپس کیا جاتا ہے تو تب بھی یہی کہا جاتا ہے “خود اٹھوایا ہوگا ورنہ زندہ کیسے واپس چھوڑ گئے ؟ ضرور ملک سے باہر جانا ہے” ارے ہمارے محبِ وطن لوگ تو کسی عورت کی عصمت دری ہو اور اس کو باہر کے ملک میں  پناہ مل جائے تو اس کو بھی یہی کہتے ہیں” خود کروایا ہوگا اپنا ریپ تا کہ ملک چھوڑ سکے”

    پہلے ہم کہتے تھے جو کروا رہا ہے بھارت کروا رہا ہے ، اب ہم کہتے ہیں جو کروا رہے ہیں خود کروا رہے ہیں ۔ میرا سوال یہ ہے کہ آخر کتنے صحافی اس ملک سے باہر گئے ؟ میرا ان محبِ وطن لوگوں سے سوال ہے کہ جب کوئی صحافی یا ظلم کے خلاف آواز اٹھانے والا انسان مرے تو کیا تب ہی  آپ کو ان حادثوں پر یقین ہوگا ؟ کیا اس کی لاش کے ٹکڑے ملیں گے تو تب ہی آپ ظالم کے خلاف آواز اٹھائیں گے ؟  اے محبِ وطن انسان ! ملک سے محبت کے لیے کیا موت ضروری ہے ؟