Tag: opinion

  • What should a girl go for: Money or looks? Azekah Daniel gives her opinion

    What should a girl go for: Money or looks? Azekah Daniel gives her opinion

    Azekah Daniel, who works as both an actor and a model, recently appeared on the cricket show ‘Har Lamha Purjosh’. She talked about what she likes in men, saying she prefers intelligence and personality over just good looks.

    During the show, she joined in fun activities and answered the host Najeeb-ul-Husnain’s questions.
    When asked about what she thinks is more important in marriage, money or looks, Azekah said, “None, I believe.” She explained, “As far as money is involved, it can be earned by either of the two parties involved or even both together. And about looks, I prefer intellect and personality over it.”

    In response to another question, Azekah said, “Directors, producers, and channels are more important for acting, rather than scripts and co-stars. I have worked with good directors on weak scripts, they either rewrite or execute in such a way which looks visually appealing to the viewers, so it’s all about how you are able to present something to the audience.”

    She also admitted that she sometimes chooses not to work on projects because of certain co-stars she doesn’t want to work with.

  • Will we have elections? Chief Justice gives his opinion

    Will we have elections? Chief Justice gives his opinion

    During a seminar on the rights of minorities, Chief Justice of Pakistan, Umar Ata Bandial, on Sunday emphasised the importance of implementing the constitution, stating that it is their duty to hold elections within 90 days of assembly dissolution as outlined in the constitution.

    He was speaking at a conference named after the late CJP AR Cornelius on the issues faced by minorities.

    “When it comes to constitutional enforcement we [SC judges] must not blink our eyes. If it says 90 days for holding the polls, it is our duty to say that and not our choice,” said the CJP.

    The top judge further stated that protecting the constitution is their fundamental duty, and that he had been informed about ongoing negotiations among political parties.

    “There is a need to follow the constitution without looking for any excuses,” remarked the chief justice.“You may call it a dispute, but I will not.”
    The CJP also said that courts cannot pass executive orders.

  • Ken Rosenthal lays bare Manfred’s thin skin

    Calling a spade a spade is one of the cardinal virtues of journalism and is what all journalists are meant to do. The broader challenge, however, is when it comes to having the gall to speak up against those in the upper echelons of power and it is then when impartial journalism can congeal into a baptism of fire. When 59-year-old Ken Rosenthal, one of baseball’s highly regarded and acclaimed baseball journalists, dared to dip his toes in that fire, he had to pay a heavy price in the form of abrupt termination of his 12-year association with the MLB Network.

    It may not have been the start Ken Rosenthal would have wanted for the new year. Way back in 2020, when all industries and organisations moiled to stay afloat amidst the deadly coronavirus pandemic, Ken Rosenthal penned dismissive columns in The Athletic in which he launched scathing attacks on Major League Baseball’s commissioner Rob Manfred and brought his mishandling of the situation into focus.

    “He (Manfred) and the owners, supposed stewards of the game, are turning the national pastime into a national punch line, effectively threatening to take their ball and go home while the country struggles with medical, economic and societal concerns,” Rosenthal wrote in his column.

    Questioning Manfred’s abilities to do his job properly, Rosenthal further wrote: “Manfred and the owners keep sinking lower. Unless making dead-on-arrival proposals, tone-deaf public remarks and other assorted blunders is your idea of negotiating savvy.”

    Unable to digest the vitriol hurled at him, Manfred flexed his muscles and Ken was taken off the air. On January 4, 2022, Andrew Marchand, senior sports writer for the New York Post, broke the unfortunate news that the MLB Network had let go of Ken Rosenthal. Manfred’s decision invited severe backlash from journalists and deservedly so. The Athletic’s senior MLB writer Britt Ghiroli tweeted that Ken cares about the truth and doing things the right way even if it’s uncomfortable.

    Former American professional baseball player and television sports commentator Ken Singleton, an Orioles Hall of Famer, called the decision terribly shortsighted and stated that it reduces the credibility of the whole product. MLB has long grumbled about how it strives to offer quality journalism to its viewers.

    However, if it thinks that a bit of criticism is a fireable offence, it would be foolish to hope that impartial journalism can thrive in the baseball industry. As a matter of fact, Major League Baseball has historically been dictatorial and authoritarian. Prior to firing Rosenthal, MLB surprisingly ended much-loved Intentional Talk’s co-host Chris Rose’s contract at the end of 2020. Rewind to September 1964, New York Yankees terminated Mel Allen’s contract before the start of the World Series for reasons unbeknownst to all save Yankees themselves.

    Luckily for baseball fans, Ken Rosenthal, a seasoned journalist and author of “Best of the Best: 35 Major League Superstars” and “Dean Smith: A Tribute”, hasn’t been completely consigned to the scrapheaps and would still be plying his trade for multiple widely-followed platforms like Fox Sports and The Athletic. Still, whichever way you look at it, it cannot be disregarded that the dictatorial firing of Ken from the MLB Network epitomises thin-skinned MLB’s hubris syndrome and their attempts to divest the sport of impartial journalism, which sets an extremely wrong precedent for up-and-coming journalists that they should not dare to speak up against those in power.

  • Asif Ali rises to the occasion

    Asif Ali rises to the occasion

    When, on the last ball of the 18th over, Asif Ali refused to take a single, rather than adding a run to Pakistan’s score with the required run rate almost touching the 12-run mark, it was obvious that he was confident enough in his abilities to take his team over the line. Or so it seemed. Two nights before, his quickfire cameo had helped Pakistan cruise to victory in a grudge match against New Zealand. Against Afghanistan, he picked up from where he had left off against New Zealand and pulled it off with aplomb to ensure that Pakistan’s record in this tournament remains unsullied.

    Heretofore, Asif’s selection in the World Cup squad drew a massive outcry. Many were of the view that he lacked the tools to translate his domestic exploits to the international stage and gratuitously touted him as a tulla, laparoo and fraudiya even though he had shown glimpses of his hard-hitting prowess multiple times for his PSL side. An average of 16 and strike rate below 125 – Asif’s sorry set of batting stats in T20Is prior to the tournament – are without a doubt dismal and not remotely redolent of someone who can thrive at the highest level. Steadfastly determined to prove that he is not a flash in the pan, Asif navigated the choppy waters and chose the biggest stage to rehabilitate himself.

    In both the matches, Asif strode out to the middle in unnerving and high-pressure situations. When he walked out to bat against New Zealand in the 15th over, Pakistan was teetering at 87 for 5 in pursuit of 135 and the required run-rate had shot past nine an over. After kicking off his World Cup campaign with a four-off Trent Boult over the third man region, he took a liking to Tim Southee and whacked him for back-to-back sixes before pulling Trent Boult for a maximum and scoring a brace off him to clinch Pakistan’s second win in the tournament.

    Against Afghanistan, when he came to bat, his side was 122 for 4 and the required run rate had crept up to more than eight with 26 runs required from the last three overs. Asif, however, only needed seven balls to get the job done. After opening his account with a single off Naveen-ul-Haq, he mercilessly dispatched seamer Karim Janat for four majestic maximums in an over to maintain Pakistan’s perfect record in the tournament. Fittingly, it was his bat from which the winning runs flowed in both the games.

    To put into context how good Asif’s six-hitting has been and how hard sixes are to come by in this tournament, take a look at this stat: Asif took 19 deliveries for these seven sixes. On the other hand, Indian batsmen took 250 balls for seven sixes, New Zealand batsmen took 240 balls for seven sixes while West Indian batsmen took 147 balls to hit seven sixes.

    More crucially, none of the seven sixes Asif struck against Afghanistan or New Zealand were mishits or mis-timed slogs. His pyrotechnics featured meaty blows over long-off, midwicket, extra cover and wide long-on — an indicator of his expansive hitting arc.

    Although Pakistan has got world number one and world number 4 T20I batters at the top of the order, they need someone who can put the finishing touches and up the ante down the order. At the biggest stage, Asif has advertised his credentials, repaid the faith of those who had faith in him, and made a telling statement that Pakistan have found the right man in him to do that job.

  • الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ : نیا آر ٹی ایس؟

    الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ : نیا آر ٹی ایس؟

    الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں کا ذکر آج کل بہت ہو رہا ہے تو میں نے سوچا چلو میں بھی قسمت آزما لوں۔ ویسے بھی الیکشن سائنس کا موسم ہے تو ہر کوئی ہی اس کا ماہر بنا ہوا ہے۔ حکومت مصر ہے کہ الیکشن ہوں گے تو الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں پر ہی ہوں گے اور اس سلسلے میں حکومت نے پیر کو الیکشن ایکٹ ترمیمی بل پارلیمنٹ کے مشترکہ اجلاس میں پیش کرنے کا فیصلہ کیا ہے جس کے زریعے الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں کے استعمال کے ساتھ دیگر قوانین مجود ہیں۔ اپوزیشن کو چھوڑ بھی دیں تو ملک میں کئی  با شعور آوازیں اس مشین کے حوالے سے تحفظات کا اظہار کر رہیں ہیں لیکن اس معاملے کو بھی ایک تماشہ بنا کر رکھ دیا گیا ہے ایک وزیر موصوف تو اتنے جذباتی ہو گئے تھے کہ الیکشن کمیشن کو آگ لگانے کا مشورہ دے بیٹھے پتا نہیں حکمران جماعت اور اس جلا دو ، پکڑ لو گھیر لو ذہنیت میں اتنی قربت کیوں ہے؟ شاید 2014 دھرنے کی پارلیمنٹ اور پی ٹی وی پر حملہ کرنے کی یاد رہ رہ کر ستانے لگتی ہے۔ خیر یہ بات تو ہر کوئی ہی اب جان گیا ہے کہ 167 جمہوری ممالک میں سے صرف 8 میں الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں کا استعمال ہوتا ہے کئی ایک ممالک ان مشینوں کو ایک لمبے عرصے تک استعمال کرنے کے بعد ترک کر چکے ہیں۔ جن ممالک نے اس پتھر کو چوم کر واپس رکھ دیا اس میں سے ایک دلچسپ کیس ہالینڈ کا ہے۔ 1960 کی دہائی میں ہالینڈ کی الیکٹورل کونسل کے سیکرٹری امریکہ میں ووٹنگ مشینوں کے استعمال دیکھ کر اس کے دلدادہ ہو گئے اور ڈچ وزارت داخلہ (ہالینڈ میں انتخابی معاملات اس وزارت کے تحت ہوتے ہیں) کو اس بات پر منا لیا کہ ملک میں ہونے والے انتخابات ووٹنگ مشینوں پر کروائے جائیں 1965 میں ہالینڈ میں الیکشن کے ضمن میں ایک نیا قانون نافذ ہوا جس کے تحت انتخابات میں ووٹنگ مشینوں کا استعمال ممکن ہو سکا۔ مارچ 1966 میں 13 مقامی میونسپیلٹیز نے امریکی طرز کی مشینوں کا صوبائی سطح کے انتخابات میں استعمال کیا۔ یہ تجربہ ناکام ہو گیا کیونکہ جلد بازی میں کئے گئے اس فیصلے کی بنا پر ووٹرز کو دقت کا سامنا ہوا جس کے سبب کئی ووٹ خالی آئے۔ اس ناکامی کے بعد ڈچ انتظامیہ نے اپنی مشینیں خود ڈیزائن کرنے کا فیصلہ کیا 1968 میں اس حوالے سے قوائد و ضوابط مرتب کئے گئے اور ڈچ آرگنائزیشن فار اپلائیڈ سائنٹیفک ریسرچ کو ایک کمپنی کے ساتھ مل کر مشین کا ڈیزائن بنانے کا کام سونپا گیا جس کے بعد اس مشین کی تیاری کا کام ڈچ اپریٹس فیکٹری کے ذمہ لگایا گیا۔ 1980 کی دہائی میں ہالینڈ کے انتخابات میں مقامی ڈیزائن پر مبنی مشینوں کا استعمال شروع کیا گیا اور 90 کی دہائی کے وسط تک ہالینڈ کے انتخابات میں وسیع پیمانے پر ان کا استعمال کیا جانے لگا۔ ان مشینوں پر کوئی سیاسی یا عوامی سطح پر بحث نہیں تھی ووٹر بھی خوش تھا اور انتظامیہ بھی کیونکہ ایک تو غلطی کے امکانات کم ہوتے تھے، نتائج جلد آ جاتے تھے اور عملے کی تعداد میں بھی کمی آ گئی تھی۔ اگرچہ 90 کی دہائی کے آخر میں ان مشینوں پر تھوڑے بہت سوالات اٹھنے لگے تھے لیکن ان کو خاص توجہ نہیں ملی 2004 میں آئرلینڈ نے ہالینڈ سے کچھ مشینیں تجرباتی بنیادوں پر حاصل کیں تاکہ انہیں یورپی پارلیمانی انتخابات میں استعمال کیا جا سکے لیکن انہیں ناقابل بھروسا اور خاطر خواہ سیکورٹی نہ ہونے کی بنا پر آئرش حکومت نے ان مشینوں کا استعمال نہ کرنے کا فیصلہ کیا  ڈچ پارلیمنٹ میں اس حوالے سے آواز بھی اٹھائی گئی مگر کسی نے کان نہ دھرے۔جولائی 2006 میں ہالینڈ کی پہلی انٹرنیٹ سروس پروائیڈر کمپنی کے بانی اور چند کمپیوٹر ماہرین نے

     ‘We do not trust voting computers’ 

    کے نام سے ایک تحریک کا آغاز کیا جی ہاں ووٹنگ مشینوں کے خلاف تحریک کسی سیاسی جماعت نے نہیں بلکہ ٹیکنالوجی ماہرین نے شروع کی خیر اس تحریک کے نتیجے میں سوالات اٹھنا شروع ہوئے اور میڈیا نے بھی توجہ دینا شروع کر دی حتی کہ ہالینڈ کے قومی ٹی وی کے ایک تفتیشی پروگرام میں دکھایا گیا کہ کیسے ایک ماہر پانچ منٹ سے بھی کم وقت میں ان مشینوں کی میموری چپ کو تبدیل کر سکتا ہے جس سے نتائج میں دھاندلی ممکن ہے۔ ڈچ وزارت داخلہ نے ڈچ انٹیلیجنس سروس اور سیکورٹی سروسز کی ڈیوٹی لگائی کہ وہ ان مشینوں کی جانچ کرے۔ ان اداروں نے مشینوں کی جانچ کے بعد بتایا کہ ہالینڈ کے الیکشن میں استعمال ہونے والی دو میں سے ایک کمپنی کی مشین میں سنگین نوعیت کے سیکورٹی مسائل ہیں اس لئے ان کا استعمال ترک کر دیا گیا۔ جبکہ دوسری کمپنی میں یہ مسائل معمولی نوعیت کے تھے جن کو نومبر میں ہونے والے عام انتخابات سے قبل میموری چپ تبدیل کرنے سمیت دیگر سیکورٹی خصوصیات بہتر کر کے استعمال میں لایا گیا۔ اسی اثناء میں پارلیمنٹ نے حکومت سے دو آزاد تحقیقاتی کمیشن قائم کرنے کا کہا جو اس معاملے کی چھان بین کر کے حکومت کو اپنی رپورٹ جمع کروائے۔ انتخابات کے بعد یہ کمیشن قائم ہوئے اور اور ان دونوں کمیشنز کی رپورٹس نے الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں کو ناقابل بھروسا اورعدم سیکورٹی سمیت متعدد خدشات کی بنا پر مسترد کرتے ہوئے دوبارہ سے بیلٹ پیپر ووٹنگ کی سفارش کی اور یوں اکتوبر 2007 میں ہالینڈ میں انتخابات کے لئے الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں کا استعمال ترک کر دیا گیا۔

     ہماری حکومت بھی ان الیکٹرانک ووٹنگ مشینوں کو کوئی الوہی چیز بنا کر پیش کر رہی ہے ویسے بھی ہمارا ٹیکنالوجی کا استعمال کا ٹریک ریکارڈ کچھ خاص اچھا نہیں ابھی تو 2018 میں آر ٹی ایس  بیٹھنے کا معاملہ پوری طرح سے عوام کے سامنے نہیں لایا گیا تو ایک اور انتخابات کو متنازعہ بنانے کی تیاریاں ہو رہی ہیں۔ موجودہ حکومت کی خاصیت ہی یہی ہے کہ نہایت عمیق, گھمبیر اور کثیرالجہت نوعیت کے مسائل کا حل نہایت سادہ الفاظ میں بتا دیتے ہیں مثلاً غربت کے خاتمے کا آسان سا نسخہ ہے کہ لوگوں کو مرغیاں اور کٹے پلوا دو بس سمجھئے کچھ ایسا ہی معاملہ یہاں بھی ہے۔ انتخابی دھاندلی میں بیلٹ پیپر اس بہت بڑے مسئلہ کا ایک جز ہے اسے خرابی کا ذمہ دار قرار دینا کوتاہ نظری بے وقوفی اور عیاری ہے۔ جبکہ الیکشن جیسے حساس معاملے پر باہمی مشاورت ، اتفاق رائے کے بغیر پارلیمنٹ کے مشترکہ اجلاس سے اس قانون کی منظوری سے موجودہ مخاصمانہ سیاسی ماحول کا پارہ مزید چڑھنے کا خدشہ ہے۔  

  • All traitors great and small

    Among the myriad promises the current federal government has failed to deliver is one pledge that the government did not commit to but has delivered in spades. I am talking about the federal administration providing us with therapy, albeit in the form of laughter. Whenever we, the people, have been at the edge of bucking under crippling inflation, the government has provided us with a moment of undiluted merriment, always at its own expense.

    In times of crisis, and what is Pakistan in if not a deep existential, democratic and economic crisis, comedians come to the rescue of their people, providing much needed merriment to take away our troubles for a moment or two. The government, however, decided to step in and provide laughter itself, in the process promoting harmony among citizens, taking away jobs from comedians as it has from nearly everyone else. We may have neither faith nor discipline but damned if we are not united in our misery.

    Last year, Faisal Vawda selflessly decided to make us laugh when he accused Dr Musadik Malik, a PhD, of being a physician to a Gulf royal family. Where else but in a social welfare state will a prominent ruling party member prove himself to be a clown just to help his people out of depression. This is not Mr Vawda’s first attempt at comedy. After elite forces had successfully thwarted an attack on the Chinese consulate in Karachi, Vawda showed up in a bulletproof vest and armed with what he said was a Glock to “defend his country”. A more unpunctual, but well-meaning, well-dressed and well-to-do vigilante had not been seen before. Take that, Batman.

    In another incident, a hilarious government announcement of Pakistan being one of the cheapest countries tied in with yet another fuel price hike. We all laughed our way to the shady hospitals where we had made deals to sell our kidneys in order to keep our bikes and cars running.

    Never one to let tradition slide, PTI has earlier this week launched a hilarious report on digital trends, just as it finalised deals on the costliest purchase of LNG. In three years, PTI has provided us with plenty of laughter but this, ladies and gentlemen, was the jewel in the crown. Compiled by what we can only assume are people with the IQ of a cabbage, the report went on to report the origins and details of “anti-state” trends. The “deep analysis” had about as much depth as the puddle a newborn would create without a diaper. Oh PTI, how do we laugh at thee? Let me count the ways.

    First off, were the graphs. Leave aside that they had probably been lifted straight off Tweepsmap, where the data was compiled from. Forget about the fact that they seemed to have been copy pasted by someone who wielded the mouse with a hoof instead of a hand. Pay attention to the fact that the content too seemed to have been finalised by someone who is getting the pay of a grade 22 officer but does not have the ability to read what has been put before him/her. The gender graph featured men, women and businesses/groups. The mind boggles at the possibilities the unveiling of this new gender has unleashed. Will we have toilets for businesses right alongside men’s and women’s? Will weddings be segregated into three sections? Will we have to issue new ID cards and passports? Will rishta aunties recalibrate their trade?

    The age graph had a section for a group aged “10-23”. Let’s concentrate on the ludicrous assertion that tweens of the country are engaging in digital warfare under the behest of anti-state elements. It’s the perfect script for a horror movie.

    Another infographic informs us that most of these anti-state handles also follow ICC. This is a win, whichever way we look at it. All traitors, great and small, gathered together at the altar of cricket with patriots, all united in their hopelessness. Brings a tear to the eye.

    Finally, the report shows us page upon page of….. screenshots. Dozens of them. Spare a thought for the poor intern or low-paid individual who slaved away at his system, gathering tweets from known pro-PTI accounts and copy pasting away. Even Prime Minister Imran Khan’s ex-wife Reham Khan was not spared from the relentlessness of his dexterous fingers and numb mind.

    Now, you may be inclined to think of this report as a loss. Our simple minds and lack of perception are to blame for this unimaginative conclusion. Remember the old adage, to think not of what the country can do for you but what you can do for the country. In this case, think not of how someone gets highly paid to embarrass the government, but that you too can get highly paid to embarrass the government, given the right connections.

    And a sufficient lack of grey matter.