Tag: PPP

  • Is the government trying to table a 27th Constitutional Amendment?

    Is the government trying to table a 27th Constitutional Amendment?

    An interesting situation is emerging in the political sphere of Pakistan as the coalition government, days after passing the 26th Constitutional Amendment, is now preparing to table the 27th Constitutional Amendment in the parliament.

    ARY News reported that a meeting was held between Shahbaz Sharif and Bilawal Bhutto Zardari yesterday in Lahore, in which it was agreed by the two coalition partners that the 27th Constitutional Amendment would also be brought into effect and all efforts would be made to do so.

    In order to pass the new amendments, the government would need a 2/3rd majority in both houses of the parliament; however, JUI-F Chief Maulana Fazl ur Rehman has categorically refused to support any new amendments while talking to the media.

    But the real question is, what is the government trying to achieve through the 27th Amendment?

    Anchorperson Maria Memon stated on her show recently that there are considerable legal loopholes in the recently passed amendments, including the fact that “a constitutional bench cannot be formed.”

    According to Memon, “Article 191A dictates that a judicial commission would be responsible for making constitutional benches. However, according to Article 175A (one), the Judicial Commission must include the most senior Judge or Judges.”

    Maria stated that this is a serious flaw, and neither a new judicial commission nor a constitution bench can be appointed unless the Parliament amends the provision through the 27th constitutional amendment.

    The question arises whether the government would try to amend the seniority list of judges in the next amendments.

    Furthermore, recently, Rana Sanaullah, while talking to the media, also hinted at the possibility of legalising military trials of civilians in the upcoming amendments.

    Geo News reported that the coalition government wants to bring the 27th constitutional amendment aimed at empowering local government systems in the provinces.

    Adviser to the PM on Political and Public Affairs Rana Sanaullah pointed to the MQM-P’s long-standing demand for legislation to amend Article 140A to empower local government, including a request to allocate funds to local government (LG) institutions similar to the financing provided to provincial administrations.

  • Imran restarted cycle of political victimization, now he is facing the music: Bilawal Bhutto

    Imran restarted cycle of political victimization, now he is facing the music: Bilawal Bhutto

    Pakistan Peoples Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto appeared on BBC Urdu for an exclusive interview on October 24 in which he talked about the recent 26th Amendments and the controversies revolving around it.

    Journalist Farhat Javed asked the PPP Chairman about the government’s insistence on passing the amendments before October 25, to which he replied: “We did have a window because we’ve seen how other judges have moulded the constitution whether it’s Article 63A or the Reserved Seats’ case to serve their personal interests. And then, on the other hand, we had a Chief Justice [Qazi Faez Isa] who could withstand pressure from fellow judges that may try to instigate him… We had a window [before Oct 25] because this man wouldn’t try to undermine what we were doing. It wasn’t possible to do such a significant thing with the presence of any other Chief Justice.”

    The journalist asked Bilawal if Justice Mansoor had been the Chief Justice, then the amendments couldn’t have been passed. Bilawal replied: “This is our stated position that the Reserved Seats’ verdict was specifically orchestrated to undermine the strength of Parliament. The verdict on Article 63A was not based on the constitution but political motives.”

    Speaking about the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) claims about the illegitimacy of the current government, Bilawal remarked, “Which Assembly has had legitimacy in the past? When we came in 2008, did we not protest that our mandate and 2/3rd majority had been stolen from us? Even then we made constitutional amendments. When Zia ul Haq made constitutional amendments, they were legitimised by the superior courts. PTI calls us Form 47, and we call them Selected.”

    Speaking on the allegations of the establishment’s pressure on PPP to pass the amendments, Bilawal stated: “These claims are lies. I have worked for the Charter of Democracy. I have done these amendments because of my mother.”

    Farhat Javed then asked the PPP Chairman what has he done to end the violence and victimization cycle in Pakistan’s politics. Bilawal sternly replied: “What have I not done to end this cycle? When my father’s neck and tongue were slit, when he was imprisoned for more than 11 years, did we do the same things to the opposition when we came into power? No, we did not. PPP, not anyone else, ended this cycle. This cycle ended in 2008 in Pakistan’s history. Who broke the cycle? Imran Khan Niazi. He used to call it ‘muk mukaa’ or ‘Jail is for punishment, not vacations’, and he is bearing the consequences for what he did. If the [violence] cycle needs to end, then he [Imran Khan] has to do it. And he is in no mood to end the cycle, so it will keep on going.”

    “Do you expect someone who has been involved in the incarceration of your father, the torture of your mother and the torture of three generations of your family? I vould have taken revenge for blood. But I say that democracy is the best revenge for them,” concluded Bilawal.

  • 26th Amendment: PPP chief all praise for Maulana Fazlur Rehman in parliament

    26th Amendment: PPP chief all praise for Maulana Fazlur Rehman in parliament

    Chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari paid tribute to Chief Jamiat Ulema Islam (JUI-F) Maulana Fazlur Rehman in parliament over his support for the 26th Constitutional Amendment.

    “Other than President Asif Ali Zardari, the second person I respect for their politics is Maulana Fazlur Rehman,” he said while addressing the National Assembly session on Sunday night.

    “Maulana’s efforts contributed the most to the success of the 26th Constitutional Amendment,” he maintained.

    Praising the political parties who voted in favour of the Constitutional Amendment bill, he forgot to mention the name of the Balochistan Awami Party (BAP).nehen his fellow lawmakers reminded him, he humorously stated, “How we can forget BAP, without BAP amendments can’t be passed.”

    Recalling the former dictators who ruled the country for around 33 years, he, in euphemistic words, declared the judiciary responsible for facilitating Martial laws over the past years.

  • PPP and JUI-F agree on 26th Constitutional Amendments

    PPP and JUI-F agree on 26th Constitutional Amendments

    Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has claimed that PPP and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl (JUI-F) have reached a 100 per cent consensus on the Constitutional Amendments.

    Speaking to the media in Islamabad, Bhutto expressed his wish by saying that Maulana Fazlur Rehman should himself present the Constitutional Amendments draft in parliament.

    Regarding the positive role of political parties on the 26th Constitutional Amendment, he urges the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party by saying, “Prove that you PTI are a political party, not social media Lashkar.”

    “Politics is a name of compromises,” Chairman PPP added.

    He further said that he hoped that Maulana Fazlur Rehman could convince the PTI leadership of the government’s proposed Constitutional Amendments.

    Meanwhile, Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Barrister Gohar Khan clarified his party stance on Constitutional Amendments by saying, “Jab tak Khan sahab ki final guidance nahi a jati tab tak hum is position ma nahi hu sakte ke hum is par vote kar sakain.”

    He remarked that the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan, gave a message to his followers from Adiala Jail Rawalpindi that Khan is firm in remaining in jail for “100 years” for the betterment of the sovereignty of the constitution.

  • ‘Pakistan to have two Chief Justices after new constitutional court,’ says Farooq H. Naek

    ‘Pakistan to have two Chief Justices after new constitutional court,’ says Farooq H. Naek

    Vice Chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC), renowned lawyer Farooq Hamid Naek said on Wednesday that there will be two Chief Justices in Pakistan after the formation of the new Federal Constitutional Court (FCC).

    Vice Chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council from Islamabad claimed that one Chief Justice will head the Federal Constitutional Court while the other will lead the Supreme Court of Pakistan, ARY News reported.

    He further stated that constitutional court judges’ performance will be recorded, and they could be removed through the Judicial Commission based on recommendations, adding that the Committee will propose names for the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court.

    Naek further said that the Federal Constitutional Court will have representation from all four provinces of Pakistan.

    Chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party, Bilawal Bhutto, has been campaigning to win the confidence of lawyers nationwide for the formation of a Constitutional Court.

    Addressing the Balochistan High Court Bar Association, the PPP Chairman stated, “If you don’t accept the constitutional courts, you should leave the practice.”

    Meanwhile, some lawyers have rejected the formation of a new constitutional court.

    Speaking at the All Pakistan Lawyers Convention (APLC) organised by the Islamabad Bar Council (IBC) on Monday, lawyers condemned the judicial package and declared it a tactic by anti-democratic forces to control the independence of the judiciary.

  • PPP scores big win in by-election against PTI

    PPP scores big win in by-election against PTI

    Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) candidate Makhdoom Tahir Rashiduddin has won a by-election in Rahim Yar Khan with a huge margin, securing one lac sixteen thousand four hundred twenty-nine votes.

    The by-election, held on Thursday in NA-171, saw the PPP candidate defeat the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) candidate Hasan Mustafa, who could only secure fifty-eight thousand two hundred fifty-one.

    In a well-hyped campaign, the polling process continued without a break from 8 AM to 5 PM.

    The by-election took place after the death of PTI Member National Assembly (MNA) Mumtaz Mustafa in the NA-171 constituency, which has 5 lac twenty-six thousand nine hundred seventy-three (526,973) votes.

    Under section 73 of the Election Act, a by-election occurs when an elected official dies, is disqualified, resigns or is unable to continue serving as a lawmaker.

  • ‘It is not short-term relief but two months’: CM Punjab Maryam Nawaz

    ‘It is not short-term relief but two months’: CM Punjab Maryam Nawaz

    Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz has strongly criticised Sindh CM Murad Ali Shah’s remarks against the Punjab government’s decision to raise electricity prices, calling it “foolish.”

    On Monday, while addressing a ceremony, Murad Ali Shah said that such “strange announcements” put them (Sindh govt) in a fix. “We (Sindh government) find it difficult how to respond to these foolish statements. But I don’t want to get into politics,” he added.

    Likewise, another Sindh minister, Saeed Ghani, also questioned the Punjab government’s policy, asking, “What will happen after two months of relief to the people of Punjab?”

    However, Maryam Nawaz expressed disbelief at the Sindh CM’s comments, remarking, “I laughed when I heard someone say it’s foolish to reduce electricity prices. Isn’t it foolish to pocket money from corruption and spend it on protocol, planes, helicopters, and convoys while denying relief to the public?”

    Last week, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) supremo Nawaz Sharif announced a relief package for the people of Punjab: Rs 14 per unit of electricity will be reduced for two months.

  • PPP leader Saeed Ghani terms Punjab govt’s relief in bills a ‘political stunt’

    PPP leader Saeed Ghani terms Punjab govt’s relief in bills a ‘political stunt’

    Sindh Minister for Local Government Saeed Ghani mocked the Punjab government’s recent move to give relief to the masses by reducing electricity prices for just two months, terming it a “political stunt.”

    He said this in response to Punjab’s government’s decision to provide relief to the public by rescuing Rs 14 per unit on electricity bills for two months (August and September).

    Ghani remarked that it was the federal government’s responsibility to provide people with cost-efficient electricity, saying, “Rs 45 billion are being expended for relief for two months only, while scores of relief works could be done with that Rs 45 billion.”

    “The question is what will happen after two months. The consumers will be paying the same [high] prices,” the PPP leader stated.

    Interestingly, Governor Sindh Kamran Tessori asked Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah on Sunday to announce a Punjab government-like relief in electricity bills.

  • PMLN Sindh President to replace Governor Sindh Kamran Tessori

    PMLN Sindh President to replace Governor Sindh Kamran Tessori

    Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PMLN) and its coalition government ally, the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), have agreed to change the Governor of Sindh, Kamran Khan Tesori.

    According to a Geo News source, the incumbent Sindh governor could be replaced by PML-N Sindh president and former head of Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) Bashir Memon.

    While responding to the report, MQM denied that the Governor will be changed.

    A spokesperson of MQM said, ‘’The Centre has not contacted us yet in this regard’.”

    PPP Sindh General Secretary Waqar Mehdi said, ‘’Kamran Tessori better go on leave until the PMLN chooses the new Governor of Sindh’’.

    In April this year, sources made similar claims that former Sindh caretaker chief minister Justice (retired) Maqbool Baqar could be appointed governor of Sindh.

  • PPP MNA raises questions about party’s Punjab chapter

    PPP MNA raises questions about party’s Punjab chapter

    Makhdoom Jamiluzzaman, a Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) affiliated Member of the National Assembly (MNA) has expressed disappointment over his party’s performance in Punjab.

    ‘’Bilawal Bhutto Zardari cannot become Prime Minister (PM) with Sindh votes only,” he said at the ceremony at a local hotel on his father’s 85th birth anniversary.

    ‘’Punjab PPP leaders have been holding essential party positions yet failing to help Bilawal. Therefore, they must step down or be removed,’’ he stated.
    Jamiluzzaman, the son of the late PPP stalwart Amin Fahim observed that the same people vote for Chief Minister (CM) Punjab Marium Nawaz and former Prime Minister Imran Khan—but not for Bilawal Bhutto. He questioned his party ‘’Why do these votes not go to Bilawal? Why is the Punjab PPP sleeping? Why are Punjab people holding important positions?”

    He also hinted at leading a delegation to meet party leadership to reactivate PPP in Punjab.