Tag: scandal

  • Actor Humaima Malick says ‘Aurat Card’ is easily used

    Actor Humaima Malick says ‘Aurat Card’ is easily used

    Is ‘Aurat Card’ even a thing now? Apparently actor Humaima Malick claims it is, implying that it helps women get away with causing trouble.

    The wife of the late controversial television host Amir Liaquat, Bushra Iqbal, was a guest on a recent podcast where she addressed her husband’s leaked video scandal. Bushra said that honour is not just important for a woman, but for a man as well.

     “Honour is not just a woman’s. A man has honour as well. Had this happened to a woman, the entire country would have been out on the street, burning things. But a woman had done this. Men and women are kept equal. God has not kept the level of punishment different in the Quran.”

    The videos were allegedly leaked by the late television host’s third wife Dania Shah, who claimed in May 2022 that she was several beaten and forced to make sexual videos to send to people abroad.

    Read more: Syeda Dania files for divorce from Aamir Liaquat, reveals he takes drugs and does domestic violence

    In the videos, Amir Liaquat could be seen in a compromising state, unclothed as he walks around a room.

    Dania Shah was arrested from her home in December 2022, and later released in 2023 after her lawyer argued that the phone number that had leaked the videos did not belong to the woman.

    Read more: Aamir Liaquat leaked video case: Dania Shah released on bail

    Actress Humaima Malick has backed Bushra Iqbal’s comment by sharing the clip where the widow speaks about honor, and in the caption of her Instagram stories she wrote: “Waqai Aurat Card is too easy, a man is also a human being.”

    We are completely in favor of Bushra Iqbal’s views that no person, whether man or a woman, should be publicly humiliated with their personal videos but Humaima Malick trying to claim that this only happened because the ‘Aurat Card’ exists is extremely disappointing, and proof of how easily women are bunched up in a whole as culprits to blame for the actions of a single person.

    There is no proof that the person responsible for the video leak was a woman. If the ‘Aurat Card’ did exist then more women, like Humaima Malick’s brother’s ex-wife Syeda Aliza, could have benefitted from such a thing as ‘Aurat Card’, because then she wouldn’t have had to suffer from domestic violence during her marriage to Feroze Khan, Humaima’s brother.

    Read more: Syeda Aliza shares heartbreaking evidence of Feroze Khan’s violent attacks on her, Celebrities react

    For an actor to publicly claim the ‘Aurat Card’ exists in a country like Pakistan, where more women are beaten, tortured by family members and very few cases are brought to the light, proves how little it takes to side against all women. Nothing is done for those who are consistently clamoring for justice. It’s incredibly dissapointing to witness such a sexist mindset among women.

  • Major corruption exposed: Helicopter parts worth Rs7 billion illegally cleared under investigation

    Major corruption exposed: Helicopter parts worth Rs7 billion illegally cleared under investigation

    In a significant corruption case, helicopter spare parts worth Rs7 billion were illegally cleared from the air freight units (AFUs) through a nexus involving Customs officials and clearing agents.

    The Customs Collector Islamabad has responded to the exposure of the nexus by forming a new two-member committee to investigate the illegal clearance of the helicopter spare parts. The committee includes an additional collector headquarters and a deputy controller preventive, who will initiate a thorough investigation into the matter.

    Prior to this, a previous probe committee had already exonerated the Customs officials, including a superintendent who had admitted to being on duty at the Royal Shade during the time of the alleged illegal clearance. However, with the emergence of new evidence, a fresh inquiry has become necessary to ensure transparency and accountability.

    Separately, a Customs officer named Imran was suspended after a video of him demanding a bribe from a passenger at the Lahore airport went viral. In the video, the officer can be seen soliciting $100 from a Canada-bound passenger who was carrying $9,500, and he threatened to seize all the money if the passenger did not comply. According to Customs law, passengers are not allowed to carry $9,500 in currency abroad to prevent illicit transactions and money laundering.

    Following the circulation of the video, the deputy collector customs took swift action by suspending the officer and directing him to report to headquarters, demonstrating the commitment to address misconduct and uphold integrity within the Customs department.

    The exposure of the helicopter spare parts corruption case and the subsequent investigation by the newly-formed committee signify a strong stance against corruption and malpractices within the Customs department. As the inquiry progresses, it is expected that appropriate measures will be taken to hold those involved in the illegal clearance of the helicopter spare parts accountable.

    The disciplinary actions taken against the Customs officer involved in bribery further emphasise the department’s dedication to ethical conduct in its operations.

  • TikToker Sundal Khattak taken into custody over Hareem Shah nudes case

    TikToker Sundal Khattak taken into custody over Hareem Shah nudes case

    TikToker Sundal Khattak was arrested on Tuesday by the Federal Investigation Authority (FIA) in a case pertaining to the Hareem Shah nudes leak scandal. An Islamabad court has also rejected her bail. Express Tribune reported that the court also rejected Khattak’s request to arrest Shah for defamation.

    Khattak has rejected claims that she leaked Shah’s videos, accusing the TikTok star of defamation on social media because of which she was receiving death threats from her followers. She was directed by the court to file an application with the local police station on the complaints.

    Hareem Shah’s nudes were leaked on the internet in March. She released a statement on social media saying that it was her close friends who had made these videos and were responsible for the leak, and she was going to take strict action against them. Shah named her close friends, Khattak and Ayesha Naz, as the ones responsible for this leak, as they would spend a lot of time with the TikTok star.

    Shah went on to reveal that she had filed a complaint with the FIA against Naz, but the organisation did not take any action against her, despite her doubts. “Ayesha had also informed my other friends that she will leak my videos,” added Shah. “But I don’t really care about these videos.”

    Speaking to Geo, her husband Bilal said he will not leave his wife in her hour of need, and revealed that he was furious at the actions of Khattak and Naz, as they had been allowed in their home and even shared their rooms

    Bilal said he was horrified that the women would do such a thing to their close friend. He said they had violated and smeared the character of a woman despite being women themselves.

    “In my eyes, they have done a very ungraceful thing,” the husband spoke: “After we land in Pakistan, we will take every legal action which can be taken.”

  • Meta to settle Cambridge Analytica scandal case for $725 million

    Meta to settle Cambridge Analytica scandal case for $725 million

    Facebook parent Meta has agreed to pay $725 million to settle a lawsuit that accused the social media giant of allowing third parties to access users’ private data. The amount was disclosed in a court filing late on Thursday.

    “The proposed settlement of $725,000,000 is the largest recovery ever achieved in a data privacy class action and the most Facebook has ever paid to resolve a private class action,” lawyers for the plaintiffs said in the filing.

    As part of the settlement, Facebook has not admitted any wrongdoing, which must still be approved by a judge in the US District Court for the District of Columbia’s San Francisco division.

    In August, it was reported that Facebook had struck a preliminary agreement, though the sum and specifics of the settlement were not disclosed at the time.

    In 2018, Facebook users accused the social network of breaking privacy guidelines by sharing their data with third parties, including the British business Cambridge Analytica, which was tied to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

    According to the lawsuit, Cambridge Analytica, which has since shut down, then gathered and abused the personal data of 87 million Facebook users without their knowledge.

    This information was allegedly utilised to create software to sway US voters in Trump’s favour.

    Since then, Facebook has banned access to its data from thousands of apps suspected of abusing it, limited the amount of information available to developers, and made it easier for users to calibrate personal data sharing settings.

    In 2019, the federal government penalised Facebook $5 billion for deceiving its users and mandated independent control of its personal data handling.

  • Bilawal Bhutto calls Imran Khan a ‘ghari chor’

    Bilawal Bhutto calls Imran Khan a ‘ghari chor’

    Foreign Minister (FM) Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari took a jibe at Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan after the PTI chief did a press conference about the Toshakhana watch scandal.

    Taking to Twitter, the minister called Khan a “ghari chor”. He asked whether Khan had dissolved the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) assemblies. “Of course not”, he said.

    He said that Khan’s efforts to turn “institutions into his tiger force to do his unconstitutional bidding failed before and will fail again.”

    On Sunday, Khan accused the media of looking the other way on important matters and instead focusing on what he implied were trivial issues, such as the Toshakhana watch scandal.

    “The channels that used to bash the PTI government for inflation, those channels are quiet now and are instead focused on a watch,” he said in a press conference in Lahore.

    “It’s my watch. I can sell it, or do whatever I want. No one is talking about the economic murder being committed right now.”

    Last month, Bilawal predicted that Khan’s party would not resign from assemblies despite his announcement to do so. He, further claimed that Khan is “lying” as he will not resign from Punjab and KP assemblies.

  • Donald Trump ka Toshakhana case: Investigators look for expensive gifts taken by Trump

    Donald Trump ka Toshakhana case: Investigators look for expensive gifts taken by Trump

    Many expensive gifts that were given to former president Donald Trump and his family by foreign leaders are being investigated by congressional investigators.

    According to those with knowledge of the situation, the National Archives, one of the institutions tasked with preserving presidential gifts, has been approached for assistance by the House Oversight Committee in locating the artifacts.

    An individual who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the gifts were unusual and included golf clubs from the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a soccer ball from the 2018 World Cup from Russian President Vladimir Putin, a gold-plated Horus collar from Egypt’s president, a huge painting of Trump from El Salvador’s president, and a $6,400 King Abdulaziz al Saud collar, a ceremonial honour from Saudi Arabia, according to The Washington Post.

    People familiar with the request believe that the dozens of gifts are worth at least $50,000 as a whole. According to sources familiar with the request, the committee has requested the archives to determine if the presents are among those that were legally obliged to be transferred from the White House to the archives at the end of Trump’s presidency. According to a Trump adviser, the committee is also interested in hearing from Trump’s team on its record-keeping practises.

    A representative for the Oversight Committee refused to comment other than to note that the inquiry is still underway, so it’s unclear why the committee asked for these particular things. Additionally, the Archives declined to comment, leaving it unknown as to how far along the search for these items is and whether or not any of the presents on the list were truly accounted for.

    Both the Trump administration’s gift-handling staff and a spokesman for the president did not reply to requests for comment.

    Following the discovery of troves of documents from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, including extremely sensitive intelligence about China and Iran, agents launched an inquiry into whether he and his advisers improperly handled classified documents.

    The Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, a 1966 law that forbids presidents and other government officials from personally keeping gifts from foreigners worth more than $415 unless they pay for them, was the subject of a separate investigation this summer by the Oversight committee at the request of its chairwoman, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney.

    Anyone who wrongfully retains the presents is not subject to any specific criminal punishment under the law. But according to ethics experts, depending on the situation, criminal prosecution might be necessary.

    “If you have a very valuable item that you are obligated by law to turn over to the federal government and you fail to do that, I don’t know that would preclude a criminal action — we’ve just never seen it done,” said Virginia Canter, the chief ethics counsel at CREW, an ethics watchdog organization.

    Items that were presented to members of the Trump family but may not have been properly reported to the State Department are among the items the Oversight committee has requested from the Archives. Additional items that were reportedly in the Trumps’ executive residence in the White House, the West Wing, or other places near the end of the administration, such as Trump Tower or Mar-a-Lago, are items that were most likely given in 2020, according to a person familiar with the situation.

    The White House failed to provide the State Department with a list of gifts that officials received from foreign governments before leaving office, according to the New York Times, which broke the story that the State Department was unable to fully account for gifts that Trump and other White House officials received during their final year in office. According to testimony gathered by the committee, the office was in complete disorder.

    Maloney’s committee is currently attempting to account for particular gifts. Various dresses from Oman, a bust of Mahatma Gandhi, an Afghan rug, a crystal ball, and various jewellery items, including diamond and gold earrings, are also included in the extensive request sent to the Archives. It also includes a marble slab commemorating the opening of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, an antique framed signed photo of Queen Elizabeth II, a marble photo of the monarch from the early 1900s, a bust of Gandhi, an Afghan rug, and a bust of Gandhi

    A 2012 congressional research study states that the White House Presents Unit typically keeps track of all domestic and international gifts received by the president and the first family, as well as the gift’s value. A representative may pay the full worth of a gift if they want to keep it.

    If not, the gift is taken to the Archives, where it is kept for presidential libraries. The park service of the Department of the Interior receives gifts intended for the White House, whereas the General Services Administration receives gifts that are not intended for the Archives or the president’s personal collection.

    A distinct list of all presents from a foreign government to a federal employee is published each year by the Office of Protocol in the State Department. Trump “failed to comply with the law requiring foreign gift reporting” during his final year in office, according to data provided by the State Department, Maloney said in a letter asking for a review of Trump’s gifts to acting archivist Debra Steidel Wall in June.

    “The Department of State noted that during the Trump Administration, the Office of the Chief of Protocol failed to request a listing of foreign gifts received in 2020 from the White House. The Department is no longer able to obtain the required records,” Maloney wrote to the Archives.

    Maloney asked for all records and information pertaining to gifts received by Trump or members of his family from the final year of the Trump administration, as well as all correspondence between the Archives and Trump, his family, and White House staff regarding foreign gifts. This information included the location and value of the gifts, the identity of the donor, and any gift reporting.

    The Trump administration’s record-keeping procedures have a pattern that includes the failure to account for presents.

    The FBI seized a number of things during their August raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club and house that were labelled as “gifts.” It’s unclear whether the seized items were lawfully transferred to Mar-a-Lago after being provided to Trump by foreign countries when he was president.

    The Washington Post has previously reported that White House officials expressed worries about the presents that Trump had received as president that were still in the White House rather than being properly turned over to the National Archives in the final days of his administration.

    The Post has previously reported that Trump departed the White House with a variety of objects, including a scale model of the proposed makeover of Air Force One and a miniature replica of one of the black border wall slats with an engraved inscription on top. Trump’s correspondence with Kim Jong Un, who is the leader of North Korea, was found in 15 boxes of materials that the National Archives retrieved from Mar-a-Lago in January. Trump had earlier called these letters “love letters.”

    “This president was very much into holding onto things,” said a former Trump White House staffer who was involved with record management and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. “Mementos and gifts are a big thing with him. Throughout his whole life he has created mementos.”

    According to John Kelly, a former chief of staff at the White House, when Trump was in office, he always sought to keep gifts from foreign heads of state.

    Kelly said that while he had given his staff instructions on how to record gifts from foreign leaders when offered the chance to purchase the items, Trump vehemently refused to do so. Kelly said that “Trump was adamant that they were his gifts, and he said that he couldn’t understand why he couldn’t keep them.”

  • Amir Khan no longer cheats on his wife because he’s an ‘old man’

    Amir Khan no longer cheats on his wife because he’s an ‘old man’

    British-Pakistani boxer Amir Khan and Faryal Makhdoom have got their own Kardashian-style show: a BBC Three documentary titled Meet The Khans: Big In Bolton, in which the couple gave fans a sneak peek into their lives and relationship.

    During the show, Faryal reportedly said that Amir no longer cheats on her because he’s an “old man” now.

    “We’ve been through hell and back,” said Faryal, while talking about the various scandals over the year. It is pertinent to mention here that Amir has been accused of cheating more than nine times.

    “He was never able to enjoy his youth because of all his hard work, so he never really got it out of his system. He’d get caught in the wrong places,” said Faryal while explaining the reasons behind her husband’s infidelity.

    “We’ve moved on. The past is the past, we were young, we grew up together – the bad and the good,” she said further, adding: “Amir was so famous and so young when I first started dating him and married him, and now it’s like… he’s an old man!”

    The social media influencer further said that labels like “gold-digger” and “doormat” deeply upset her.

    Agreeing with Faryal, Amir said: “It changes with time. When you have three kids, it changes your responsibilities. I’ve had that crazy life before, now I’m a changed man.”

    Meanwhile, during an in-camera therapy session, Faryal, in between tears, tells her therapist: “My relationship still gets judged for what I’ve been through. A lot of people have ups and downs – the only difference is my marriage is quite public. I married a celebrity.”

    Faryal and Amir’s real life has been nothing short of a reality series marked with a long feud with the in-laws followed by an emotional reunion, cheating allegations, extramarital affairs and public scandals. The couple has three kids, Lamaisah aged 6, Alayna aged 2 and Muhammad Zaviyar aged 8 months.

    Amir is also no stranger to reality tv – he has also taken part in I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here, Countdown, Beat the Star, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire and Celebrity Juice.

  • Court acquits couple accused of blackmailing NAB chief

    Court acquits couple accused of blackmailing NAB chief

    An accountability court Tuesday acquitted the couple accused of blackmailing the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) chairperson.

    According to journalist Zahid Gishkori, the two suspects, namely Tayyaba Gul and Farooq Nol, were acquitted over lack of evidence.

    In connection with the leaked scandalous audio-video tapes being associated with its chairman, NAB had filed a reference in an accountability court in 2019 against a gang allegedly involved in blackmailing several people, Justice (r) Javed Iqbal.

    In the 630-page reference, NAB had nominated Gul, the woman seen and heard on the tapes, and her husband, Nol, as the main suspects.

    According to The Express Tribune, the graft buster stated in the reference that the couple had defrauded several citizens of around Rs24.4 million.

    It added that NAB had received six complaints against Gul and Nol and 36 witnesses had recorded their statements against them.

    On May 23, News One had aired the purported conversation of the NAB chairman with a woman. However, it was left red-faced and had to tender a public apology after the bureau denied the story.

    The NAB issued a statement, rejecting the report and saying that all such reports were baseless, contrary to facts, fabricated and part of a false propaganda.

    “This is work of a group of blackmailer, who want to tarnish reputation of NAB and its chairman. Disregarding all the pressure and blackmailing, NAB has not only arrested two members of the group but also approved a reference against them,” the statement read.

    The channel admitted that it had not done due diligence and therefore needed further substantiation regarding the videos. The channel management also apologised for any inconvenience caused to the NAB chairman.

    NAB had said there were a total of 42 FIRs registered against members of the racket in different parts of the country.

    “The group is involved in blackmailing, kidnapping for ransom, scamming and looting of billions of rupees from government servants as well as private individuals by impersonating FIA personnel and NAB has evidence in this regard,” it said.

    It said the report was a tactic to escape a NAB reference through blackmailing. According to the statement, the kingpin of the group, Farooq, is currently incarcerated at Kot Lakhpat Jail.

  • Opposition concerned over ex-SC judge heading Broadsheet scandal investigation panel

    Opposition concerned over ex-SC judge heading Broadsheet scandal investigation panel

    Two of the country’s major opposition parties, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), have expressed reservations on the investigation panel that is to be headed by former Supreme Court (SC) justice, Azmat Saeed, to investigate the Broadsheet scandal.

    Speaking to a private media outlet on Thursday, senior PML-N leader Ahsan Iqbal pointed out that the former SC judge was part of the bench in the Panama Papers case that disqualified then prime minister (PM) Nawaz Sharif.

    “He was later invited by PM Imran Khan to join the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital’s Board of Governors after his retirement.”

    Ahsan also pointed out that during the Musharraf regime, when the asset recovery agreement was signed with Broadsheet, Justice Azmat was part of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

    Meanwhile, PPP Secretary General Nayyer Bukhari said the PTI’s dishonesty had been exposed by the nomination of committee head. “It seems that the government wants to put all the blame on the previous governments.”

    Bukhari said the PPP has reservations on the committee, adding, “it is a sensitive matter which should be investigated in a transparent manner.”

    According to the Supreme Court’s website, Justice Azmat was the anti-graft watchdog’s deputy prosecutor general in Islamabad in the year 2000 for a period of one year and was later appointed NAB special prosecutor in 2001 to prosecute cases before accountability courts at Attock Fort and in Rawalpindi.

    However, it is not clear if the former judge had played a role, if any, in the formulation and signing of the asset recovery agreement and/or its eventual termination.

    It was reported earlier on Thursday that Azmat will lead the inquiry commission to examine the circumstances relating to the Broadsheet agreement and subsequent arbitration proceedings that resulted in substantial loss to the national exchequer.

    The announcement was made by Information Minister Shibli Faraz.

    Science and Technology Minister Fawad Chaudhry also said that “PM Imran Khan has appointed Justice (r) Azmat Saeed as head of the Broadsheet inquiry committee”, adding that the remaining members of the committee would be appointed with Justice (r) Azmat’s consultation.